Predatory publishers list
04.12.13
A list of questionable, scholarly,
open-access publishers, also known as “predatory
publishers” is listed here.
www.scholarlyoa.com is run by Mr. Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at
Auraria Library, University of Colorado Denver.
Numerous “expert” witnesses have taken left hooks and straight jabs to their reputations for publishing in these kinds of journals, which often have no peer review, no identifiable editor, etc. They do, however, often feature clever use of the word “International.”
Numerous “expert” witnesses have taken left hooks and straight jabs to their reputations for publishing in these kinds of journals, which often have no peer review, no identifiable editor, etc. They do, however, often feature clever use of the word “International.”
The write investment: author wins millions from advisor
02.19.13
Mystery author Patricia Cornwell won
$50.9m from financial advisor Anchin, Block & Anchin LLP. We
have investigated these cases before for financial services
clientele, usually focusing on claims of negligent trading and
breach of fiduciary duty (and whether the client is getting trading
tips elsewhere and acting on them). These cases often stem from the
discrepancy between the signed documents that spell out a
client’s investment goals, and trading done in later years
that might diverge from that plan. A wise advisor should make sure
they amply document the client’s goals, and consent to
trades.
Use of lies and deception during interrogations
01.30.13
The Reid Interview folks offer some
thoughts on using deception during interrogations. The article
cites case law such as Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731 (1969) (which
holds the use of deception must be considered within the totality
of circumstances when deciding the admissibility of a confession)
and Cayward v. Fl., 552 So 2nd 971 (1989) (which compares and
contrasts manufacturing evidence and false verbal
assertions).
Some recent research of how innocent people may confess to crimes they did not commit makes this an area worth close monitoring, and points to the ed
Some recent research of how innocent people may confess to crimes they did not commit makes this an area worth close monitoring, and points to the ed
Federal prosecutors and abuse of power
01.18.13
The news is filled with frantic claims
of abuses by federal prosecutor Carmen Ortiz in the Aaron Swartz
case. Some more measured claims are made by retired judge Nancy Gertner.
Now, many privacy and security experts are demanding that Congress rein in prosecutors from overcharging defendants under new federal statutes that allow them to inject steroids into minor charges and blow them into major felonies. But the inquiries into the federal justice system should not stop there.
In December 2012, USA TODAY reexamined some of the conclusions of a 1990’s PBS Frontline investigation that shone a spotlight into the dark corners of the snitch system, where federal agents offer deals to prisoners in exchange for information. Both inquiries show that the government regularly pays witnesses to testify--a concept that instinctively seems immoral and wrong to most people. Paying for information is a blatant perversion of justice and leads to lazy and careless work by federal law enforcement.
~ Our office has defended cases where a few hours of research completely debunked the information provided by another inmate--claims that seemingly were accepted by federal agents without any vetting.
~ The rewards paid to informants can include cash, airfare and new housing. Sometimes, the amount paid for information can approach $250,000 or more.
This system of paying witnesses for false information is a cancer in our democracy. Let us now eradicate it.
Now, many privacy and security experts are demanding that Congress rein in prosecutors from overcharging defendants under new federal statutes that allow them to inject steroids into minor charges and blow them into major felonies. But the inquiries into the federal justice system should not stop there.
In December 2012, USA TODAY reexamined some of the conclusions of a 1990’s PBS Frontline investigation that shone a spotlight into the dark corners of the snitch system, where federal agents offer deals to prisoners in exchange for information. Both inquiries show that the government regularly pays witnesses to testify--a concept that instinctively seems immoral and wrong to most people. Paying for information is a blatant perversion of justice and leads to lazy and careless work by federal law enforcement.
~ Our office has defended cases where a few hours of research completely debunked the information provided by another inmate--claims that seemingly were accepted by federal agents without any vetting.
~ The rewards paid to informants can include cash, airfare and new housing. Sometimes, the amount paid for information can approach $250,000 or more.
This system of paying witnesses for false information is a cancer in our democracy. Let us now eradicate it.
MA high court: no privacy in recent call list
12.05.12
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial
Court ruled that police do not need a warrant to search the cell
phone call history of a person arrested in connection with a crime.
The court ruled that police have long been allowed under the
Constitution to search for evidence of a crime on the person and
their belongings when the person is in custody.
“The limited search of the recent call list on the defendant’s cellular telephone was permissible under both the Fourth Amendment and [Article 14]’’ of the state’s Declaration of Rights...” The list of calls made from a cell phone therefore has no expectation of privacy in that setting.
The court specifically left open the question of whether, if the phone seized had capabilities of storing text messages, emails, browser histories and photographs, those data troves are also searchable without a warrant: “We do not suggest that the assessment necessarily would be the same on different facts, or in relation to a different type of intrusion into a more complex cellular telephone or other information storage device.’’
Other state courts have gone the other way on this question and a Supreme Court ruling will be needed to clarify the growing murk. The Mass. case is COMMONWEALTH vs. Demetrius A. PHIFER. SJC-11242 and full text is found here
“The limited search of the recent call list on the defendant’s cellular telephone was permissible under both the Fourth Amendment and [Article 14]’’ of the state’s Declaration of Rights...” The list of calls made from a cell phone therefore has no expectation of privacy in that setting.
The court specifically left open the question of whether, if the phone seized had capabilities of storing text messages, emails, browser histories and photographs, those data troves are also searchable without a warrant: “We do not suggest that the assessment necessarily would be the same on different facts, or in relation to a different type of intrusion into a more complex cellular telephone or other information storage device.’’
Other state courts have gone the other way on this question and a Supreme Court ruling will be needed to clarify the growing murk. The Mass. case is COMMONWEALTH vs. Demetrius A. PHIFER. SJC-11242 and full text is found here
Body language and lie detection
11.01.12
Here at the office, the staff has
become quite adept at looking into people’s eyes and telling
when they are lying. Not the sort of thing that makes you popular
at parties, and poker games tend to devolve into bloodbaths, but
lie detection comes in handy in the detective business.
The Center for Nonverbal Studies Gestures in Spokane WA has compiled a dictionary of Signs & Body Language Cues to get you started. Final exam will be reading the face of Bill Belichick.
The Center for Nonverbal Studies Gestures in Spokane WA has compiled a dictionary of Signs & Body Language Cues to get you started. Final exam will be reading the face of Bill Belichick.
Subpoena to Google, Yahoo and others
10.14.12
As we field more calls on electronic
discovery, recall that federal law prohibits electronic
communication services from disclosing “contents of a
communication” [18 USC § 2702] which most courts deem to be
the text of the email or text message. Facebook, Myspace, Twitter
and Linkedln as well as email providers such as Gmail, Yahoo and
Hotmail all fall in the this category.
A criminal subpoena may get you even the content of messages (and we get this material either from the electronic communication service providers -- or from the prosecutor) . However in a civil case, you can subpoena only basic information such as the name of the user of the account and other identifiers.
A court in Connecticut also explored a new avenue: divorcing parties may be ordered to exchange Facebook and dating site login and passwords.
A criminal subpoena may get you even the content of messages (and we get this material either from the electronic communication service providers -- or from the prosecutor) . However in a civil case, you can subpoena only basic information such as the name of the user of the account and other identifiers.
A court in Connecticut also explored a new avenue: divorcing parties may be ordered to exchange Facebook and dating site login and passwords.
Crime fiction Telegraph Hill is released
09.26.12
Delighted to announce my crime novel,
Telegraph Hill, was selected to be one of the featured books in the
launch of www.libboo.com, a new eBook publishing
venture.
https://www.libboo.com/read/telegraph-hill/johnnardizzii
If you enjoy noir crime novels in the vein of Dennis Lehane, James Lee Burke, and Raymond Chandler, feel free to stop by and take advantage of special pricing-- all for less than a mocha coffee, or 2 beers at your local dive bar. You can also preview it with a free download.
https://www.libboo.com/read/telegraph-hill/johnnardizzii
If you enjoy noir crime novels in the vein of Dennis Lehane, James Lee Burke, and Raymond Chandler, feel free to stop by and take advantage of special pricing-- all for less than a mocha coffee, or 2 beers at your local dive bar. You can also preview it with a free download.
Subpoenas and court orders to Facebook
09.07.12
We continue to get questions on what
records can be obtained by subpoena or court order to Facebook.
Generally, only a criminal case subpoena or court order will result
in Facebook complying. In that case, we have seen all kinds of data
turned over: photos, wall posts, photos uploaded to a page, lists
of Facebook friends. Perhaps most intriguing and helpful is login
and IP address data--which can be linked to physical addresses in
some other private databases that we (and most PIs)
subscribe.
Note that while these subpoena’s are most often sent by law enforcement, a defendant is entitled to the same data (just not in expedited fashion like an on-going investigation might require).
According to Facebook’s Law Enforcement and Third-Party Matters (not easily found on the site, in Facebook’s typical sloppy manner): “Federal law prohibits Facebook from disclosing user content (such as messages, timeline posts, photos, etc.) in response to a civil subpoena. Specifically, the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq., prohibits Facebook from disclosing the contents of an account to any non-governmental entity pursuant to a subpoena or court order.”
Note that while these subpoena’s are most often sent by law enforcement, a defendant is entitled to the same data (just not in expedited fashion like an on-going investigation might require).
According to Facebook’s Law Enforcement and Third-Party Matters (not easily found on the site, in Facebook’s typical sloppy manner): “Federal law prohibits Facebook from disclosing user content (such as messages, timeline posts, photos, etc.) in response to a civil subpoena. Specifically, the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq., prohibits Facebook from disclosing the contents of an account to any non-governmental entity pursuant to a subpoena or court order.”
Massachusetts medical malpractice
08.27.12
The state of Massachusetts recently
passed a health care bill that has an intriguing medical
malpractice angle: the disclosure, apology and offer clause, which
prompts health care providers to give information to patients about
medical errors in a timely manner and offers a timeframe for an
apology and offer of damages. An apology has been shown to be an
incredibly important part to a process that too often lacks any
emotional depth. One intriguing section in the bill might be an
area for future litigation: a doctor's (or hospital’s)
apology is inadmissible in future court proceedings unless the
doctor says something later that contradicts the apology.
Wrongful convictions and Chicago Police-
06.21.12
Good piece on National Registry of Exonerations report
that shows Cook County, Illinois leads the nation in documented
wrongful convictions. The great majority of those cases -- 67 since
1986 -- were handled by the Chicago Police Department.
As the article notes, “That’s a number to be ashamed of. There are 67 cases in which the Chicago Police collected "evidence" of serious wrongdoing against a person who turned out to be innocent....More shocking still is this fact: the Chicago Police Department has never conducted an investigation, filed disciplinary charges or imposed discipline on a single police officer for negligence or any other form of wrongdoing in a single one of these cases. (Chief) Gerry McCarthy and his predecessors just don't care.”
As the article notes, “That’s a number to be ashamed of. There are 67 cases in which the Chicago Police collected "evidence" of serious wrongdoing against a person who turned out to be innocent....More shocking still is this fact: the Chicago Police Department has never conducted an investigation, filed disciplinary charges or imposed discipline on a single police officer for negligence or any other form of wrongdoing in a single one of these cases. (Chief) Gerry McCarthy and his predecessors just don't care.”
Misguided CORI reform
05.07.12
Massachusetts today unveiled its new
iCORI system for criminal background data. According to the
Boston Globe, some community groups want to cut off
access to this data, citing problems with investigators who go to
courthouses and obtain original records with additional information
about the crimes.
These groups are attacking the very procedures recommended under federal law and by industry experts to avoid mistakes in background checks. In effect they want to ban users of iCORi who search out original documents. In effect, they want to forced employers to act on a dry sparse records for fear that, say details about, say a habitual offender who seems to prey on women, should come to light.
These groups are attacking the very procedures recommended under federal law and by industry experts to avoid mistakes in background checks. In effect they want to ban users of iCORi who search out original documents. In effect, they want to forced employers to act on a dry sparse records for fear that, say details about, say a habitual offender who seems to prey on women, should come to light.
Forensic experts: a pervasive lack of national standards
04.19.12
This article sums up the problem with the lack of
national standards for forensic experts. While organizations like
American College of Forensic Examiners International Inc. purport
to test forensic experts, according to the article many of these
“colleges” award certificates after testers take brief
online examinations--sometimes written by people with no background
in the field: According to the article:
“Other former employees said it was routine for low-level staffers to write exams for ACFEI and its related organizations based on textbooks in subject areas in which they had no expertise.
Tania Miller worked for six months as chief association officer for the American Psychotherapy Association, an ACFEI sister group, beginning in fall 2010. A few weeks into her job, she said, she was asked to author an exam to certify forensic counselors. Miller's background was in marketing and graphic design. She said she declined to write the exam. ACFEI did not respond to questions about Miller.”
This situation highlights why competent lawyers always conduct a full background examination of any expert, testing credentials, no matter how old.
“Other former employees said it was routine for low-level staffers to write exams for ACFEI and its related organizations based on textbooks in subject areas in which they had no expertise.
Tania Miller worked for six months as chief association officer for the American Psychotherapy Association, an ACFEI sister group, beginning in fall 2010. A few weeks into her job, she said, she was asked to author an exam to certify forensic counselors. Miller's background was in marketing and graphic design. She said she declined to write the exam. ACFEI did not respond to questions about Miller.”
This situation highlights why competent lawyers always conduct a full background examination of any expert, testing credentials, no matter how old.
Client acquitted in Mattapan case
03.22.12
Acquittal in murder case: After 15
months of intensive defense investigation, a jury found our client
Edward Washington not guilty on all charges in the murders of four
people, including a two-year-old boy, during a robbery in September
2010. The Boston Globe and Boston Herald reported on the intense pressure
facing families of both the victims and accused during the 6 week
trial.
The defense investigation focused on the role of Kimani Washington, a career criminal whose story about participating in the armed robbery but leaving the scene before the murders, never made sense to most court observers. Eyewitness accounts described a silver/gray SUV with blue license plate driven by a bald headed man racing from the scene -- a match to Kimani and a Ford Edge he stole from a victim. Moreover, Kimani’s story changed repeatedly. Evidence showed he held a grudge against his cousin Edward Washington and had slashed his face with a cane--a stark contrast to his description of their relationship as “beautiful”. Defense lawyers Jack Cunha and Helen Holcomb were able to use the evidence to thoroughly impeach Kimani at trial. They also pointed to mistakes such as the Boston Police arresting Kimani just a few hours after the murders, holding keys to a silver SUV--but incredibly, failing to test him for gunpowder residue. Photos of the SUV were taken by some of the police-controlled security cameras dotting Mattapan, but they were not preserved by police.
Kimani later fled to New Hampshire where he was arrested. This case illustrated most graphically the problem with rewarding a cooperating witness of Kimani’s ilk with a deal that cut decades off a prison sentence for murder, if he had faced a jury.
The defense investigation focused on the role of Kimani Washington, a career criminal whose story about participating in the armed robbery but leaving the scene before the murders, never made sense to most court observers. Eyewitness accounts described a silver/gray SUV with blue license plate driven by a bald headed man racing from the scene -- a match to Kimani and a Ford Edge he stole from a victim. Moreover, Kimani’s story changed repeatedly. Evidence showed he held a grudge against his cousin Edward Washington and had slashed his face with a cane--a stark contrast to his description of their relationship as “beautiful”. Defense lawyers Jack Cunha and Helen Holcomb were able to use the evidence to thoroughly impeach Kimani at trial. They also pointed to mistakes such as the Boston Police arresting Kimani just a few hours after the murders, holding keys to a silver SUV--but incredibly, failing to test him for gunpowder residue. Photos of the SUV were taken by some of the police-controlled security cameras dotting Mattapan, but they were not preserved by police.
Kimani later fled to New Hampshire where he was arrested. This case illustrated most graphically the problem with rewarding a cooperating witness of Kimani’s ilk with a deal that cut decades off a prison sentence for murder, if he had faced a jury.
Reduce your Massachusetts alimony payments
03.08.12
Massachusetts reputation as the only state where alimony never ends is over as of March 1, 2012. The Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act has addressed the issue of changing financial circumstances, and places time limits on payments.
Judges can now reduce or terminate alimony to your ex-spouse if he / she is living with another person and receiving financial support from that person.
Cohabiting is defined as keeping a common household with another person for a continuous period of at least 3 months. The law does not limit co-habitation to sexual relationships. Reinstatement of alimony is possible if cohabitation ends however.
If you need evidence to prove that your ex-spouse is living with someone, supporting them financially, paying rent and groceries, then we can help. Ensure that you pay only your fair share. Call us for further details.
Court conducts own review of video evidence
01.06.12
In an unusual appellate decision, a
Massachusetts court evaluated how much weight can be given to
inconclusive and sporadic surveillance video of a claimant. In
Maher v Massachusetts
General Hospital Long Term Disability Plan, the 1st Circuit
Court of Appeals weighed the video evidence in comparison to the
number of days of surveillance to find for a disability
claimant.
Video evidence showed the claimant employee driving, walking, jogging, lifting a child, and even flying a kite. Unusual for an appellate decision, the judges delved into the fact investigation, noting: “On 10 of the 19 days of surveillance, plaintiff Maher engaged in no activity.” The court found that “In over 90 minutes of surveillance, the most damning evidence the MGH Plan can identify is 15 minutes during which Maher carried a bucket or pot and 30 minutes during which Maher played with her 3 year old son in the park.”
The plan administrator viewed the evidence as showing what doctors had previously concluded: the claimant was not totally disabled. But the court was not convinced: “ Thus most of the surveillance, far from contradicting Maher's disability, seems to confirm her lifestyle as generally housebound with occasional, limited activity.”
Interestingly, the court did not reinstate disability benefits, but instead returned the case to the administrator for further evaluation. Defendant’s attorney noted that three different review boards had found the video evidence did not show the employee met the definition of disability.
Video evidence showed the claimant employee driving, walking, jogging, lifting a child, and even flying a kite. Unusual for an appellate decision, the judges delved into the fact investigation, noting: “On 10 of the 19 days of surveillance, plaintiff Maher engaged in no activity.” The court found that “In over 90 minutes of surveillance, the most damning evidence the MGH Plan can identify is 15 minutes during which Maher carried a bucket or pot and 30 minutes during which Maher played with her 3 year old son in the park.”
The plan administrator viewed the evidence as showing what doctors had previously concluded: the claimant was not totally disabled. But the court was not convinced: “ Thus most of the surveillance, far from contradicting Maher's disability, seems to confirm her lifestyle as generally housebound with occasional, limited activity.”
Interestingly, the court did not reinstate disability benefits, but instead returned the case to the administrator for further evaluation. Defendant’s attorney noted that three different review boards had found the video evidence did not show the employee met the definition of disability.
Facebook downgrades privacy policy
12.18.11
Background checks are getting easier
everyday. Without getting customer consent, and following a
decision by the Federal Trade Commission finding that the company
had engaged in "unfair and deceptive" trade practices, Facebook
announced today that it would make old posts available--even if
archived. The FTC had found many instances where Facebook made
profile information that a user chose to restrict to “Only
Friends” or “Friends of Friends” accessible to
any Platform Applications that the user’s Friends had used.
More here.
Restyled federal rules of evidence
12.08.11
Seeking to avoid the new Coke
marketing fiasco of the 1980s, the feds are rolling out the
clarification in terms as a “restyled” FRE. Not new,
just better. Enjoy a sip from the folks at Federal
Evidence Review.
Investigation New England Patriots defensive rankings
11.30.11
Crack research staff here at Nardizzi
Inc took a break from murders, frauds, infringing websites and
sexual harassers to examine the 2001 Patriot (aka Marshall
Faulk-killing) team, which won the Super Bowl over the Rams. That
team was ranked:
24th in total yards defense.
6th in scoring defense.
Oddly enough the offense had similar ranks: 6th in scoring, 19th in yards.
Point differential was 99.
This year the Patriot defense is:
32nd in total yards defense.
10th in scoring defense.
Offense is 4th scoring, 2nd yards
Point differential is 90.
Scent of a Super Bowl lingers in the winter air...
* 2011 team however no longer employs one Antwan Harris, who combined in the greatest backyard football play ever, taking a lateral from Troy Brown after Brown blocked a Steeler field goal attempt. Harris ran 49 yards for a touchdown in the 2001 AFC Championship game, sending waves of Steeler fans into an icy depression (and spiking a notable increase in the Pittsburgh crime rate as well).
Courtesy of the research staff...
24th in total yards defense.
6th in scoring defense.
Oddly enough the offense had similar ranks: 6th in scoring, 19th in yards.
Point differential was 99.
This year the Patriot defense is:
32nd in total yards defense.
10th in scoring defense.
Offense is 4th scoring, 2nd yards
Point differential is 90.
Scent of a Super Bowl lingers in the winter air...
* 2011 team however no longer employs one Antwan Harris, who combined in the greatest backyard football play ever, taking a lateral from Troy Brown after Brown blocked a Steeler field goal attempt. Harris ran 49 yards for a touchdown in the 2001 AFC Championship game, sending waves of Steeler fans into an icy depression (and spiking a notable increase in the Pittsburgh crime rate as well).
Courtesy of the research staff...
Doctor complains; federal agency cripples public database
11.10.11
Interesting story about a database run by U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services that maintains discipline and
medical-malpractice information. Diligent journalists and
investigators could reference the database and, via other sources,
sometimes identify doctors with long histories of being sued or
disciplined for medical malpractice. Neurosurgeon Robert T. Tenny
of Overland Park, Kansas was identified in this manner. His
complaints led to the database being shut down for a time, only to
be relaunched --with users required to promise not to link
information in the database with publicly available information,
like court files. Congress is now looking at the agency’s
role in restricting speech and use of public data.
No right of privacy in IP case
11.09.11
Judge Young in Liberty Media Holdings,
LLC v. Swarm Sharing Hash File & Does 1 through 38, held "the
constitutional presumption of openness of judicial proceedings"
trumps the privacy claims of defendants, who swarmed to illegally
download and distribute gay pornography. The film (with the winsome
title “Corbin Fisher Amateur College Men Down on the
Farm”) was downloaded illegally; the IP addresses of the
downloaders was used to track and identify them. Young did leave an
opening for defendants: “Nevertheless, should individual
defendants be concerned about being publicly 'outed' as discovery
proceeds, the Court will entertain those arguments on an individual
basis.”
FBI Stingray can track cell phones
10.09.11
The FBI pursued a man they called
“the Hacker.” Using a cellphone-tracking device called
Stingray, they focused on a California home and arrested the man.
Stingrays can locate a mobile phone even when it’s not being
used to make a call.
Oddly enough, a price list for Harris Corporation wireless surveillance products including Stingray was published on the website of the City of Miami. Cost is only $75,100.
Oddly enough, a price list for Harris Corporation wireless surveillance products including Stingray was published on the website of the City of Miami. Cost is only $75,100.
Former SEC counsel Becker says ethics officer cleared him
09.24.11
Former Securities and Exchange Commission General
Counsel David Becker has been criticized for making decisions
on how victims of Madoff’s Ponzi scheme would recover assets
because his family once had investment with Madoff’s firm.
However, Becker said he disclosed the possible conflict of interest
to the SEC chairman as well as the regulator’s ethics
officer. Both cleared him to participate in the Madoff matter.
Glik wins; right to record police upheld in 1st Circuit
09.08.11
The Glik case has been resolved resoundingly in favor of
the First Amendment right to publicly to record the activities of
police officers on public business anywhere in the First Circuit.
One quote summarizes the case best: "Glik filmed the defendant
police officers in the Boston Common, the oldest city park in the
United States and the apotheosis of a public forum. In such
traditional public spaces, the rights of the state to limit the
exercise of First Amendment activity are 'sharply
circumscribed.'"
On the MA wiretap law banning secret recordings, the court wrote: “The presence of probable cause was not even arguable here. ... For the reasons we have discussed, we see no basis in the law for a reasonable officer to conclude that such a conspicuous act of recording was 'secret' merely because the officer did not have actual knowledge of whether audio was being recorded.”
On the MA wiretap law banning secret recordings, the court wrote: “The presence of probable cause was not even arguable here. ... For the reasons we have discussed, we see no basis in the law for a reasonable officer to conclude that such a conspicuous act of recording was 'secret' merely because the officer did not have actual knowledge of whether audio was being recorded.”
Beyond Bars: Dennis Maher moves on
09.01.11
In a Boston Globe piece, Dennis Maher has moved beyond
the wrongful conviction that took prime years from his freedom.
“I got over losing the 19 years of my life,’’
says Maher, 50, in an even tone. “I don’t try and make
up for it because I can’t. The best that I can do is just go
forward. Don’t hold the anger.’’
In addition to his job at Waste Management, where he started working one month after his release, Maher speaks publicly at conferences and other events involved with wrongful convictions and the importance of access to DNA testing. “It’s part of the healing process,’’ says Maher. “I enjoy it.’’
In addition to his job at Waste Management, where he started working one month after his release, Maher speaks publicly at conferences and other events involved with wrongful convictions and the importance of access to DNA testing. “It’s part of the healing process,’’ says Maher. “I enjoy it.’’
Setting witnesses at ease: one question to avoid
08.10.11
A former cop turned PI introduced
himself to a witness during an interview. Case involved a contract
dispute in the business session in Suffolk Superior Court. Within
10 second of the introduction, he said: “I’ve been
doing this for a while so let’s start from the top: what is
your Social Security Number?”
Asking someone a question like that does not make them feel warm and secure. A question like that makes people shut down. It suggests that the questioner is a clueless conversationalist or a creepy stalker. Not sure when the trend began for opening with such questions (“Nice to meet you. How big is your pancreas?”). But stop it. Now.
Asking someone a question like that does not make them feel warm and secure. A question like that makes people shut down. It suggests that the questioner is a clueless conversationalist or a creepy stalker. Not sure when the trend began for opening with such questions (“Nice to meet you. How big is your pancreas?”). But stop it. Now.
Chinese reverse mergers a growing problem
07.26.11
The number of lawsuits against Chinese
reverse merger companies nearly tripled since 2010, according to a
study by Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse
and Cornerstone Research. "Securities Class Action Filings: 2011
Mid-Year Assessment," reports that 24 class action lawsuits were
filed against Chinese reverse merger companies in 2011. Reverse
mergers work as follows: a Chinese business is acquired by an
American shell company that is publicly traded. The board then
resigns, a Chinese-appointed board takes control and changes the
company name. Voila: it now can issue new stock to investors, all
without IPO costs and paperwork.
News of the World PI apologizes for phone hack
07.01.11
British private investigator Glenn
Mulcaire is at the centre of the News of the World phone-hacking
scandal. He issued a public apology and attributed mistakes made at the behest
of News as due to "constant demand for results". He released the
statement after his "vilification" following the revelation of the
hacking of a missing schoolgirl's voicemails.
Federal agents get more leeway to investigate
06.25.11
The FBI: the Vault has a redacted but
still interesting fact-filled guide on its website: FBI Domestic
Investigations and Operations Guide (DIOG. It is undergoing a
significant new change granting more power and less oversight to
agents conducting the lowest category of investigations (termed an
“assessment”). Assessments allow agents to look into
people and organizations without any evidence of criminal or
terrorist activity.
Under current rules, agents must open such an inquiry before they can search for information about a person in a commercial or law enforcement database. Under the new rules, agents will be allowed to search databases without making a record.
Under current rules, agents must open such an inquiry before they can search for information about a person in a commercial or law enforcement database. Under the new rules, agents will be allowed to search databases without making a record.
FBI received Santa Monica tip--in 2008
06.25.11
The Santa Monica Times reporting an intriguing story
that a Las Vegas man vacationing in California recognized Whitey
Bulger sitting on a park bench at historic Santa Monica Pier,
chatting with a kid wearing a Boston T-shirt about city
neighborhoods-- in 2008. The man recognized Bulger because he'd
just seen the FBI corruption story featured on an episode of
"America's Most Wanted."
Steve Katz, the show's co-executive producer, confirmed that the show did get a tip in 2008 that Bulger was in Santa Monica. He added that the information about Bulger being in Santa Monica was turned over to authorities. The FBI couldn’t confirm Thursday whether the agency ever received such a tip.
it.
Steve Katz, the show's co-executive producer, confirmed that the show did get a tip in 2008 that Bulger was in Santa Monica. He added that the information about Bulger being in Santa Monica was turned over to authorities. The FBI couldn’t confirm Thursday whether the agency ever received such a tip.
it.
Massachusetts access to DNA testing
06.10.11
Client Dennis Maher wrote an op-ed in
the Herald and testified this week on a Post-conviction
DNA Access Bill pending before the Joint Committee on the
Judiciary. Maher was exonerated by DNA testing after spending close
to 20 years in prison for rapes he did not commit. This firm later
investigated on his behalf in a civil action, resulting in a
multimillion dollar settlement.
Russian police officer cleared in prison death of lawyer
06.03.11
A senior Russian police officer was cleared of
wrongdoing in prison death of lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, a lawyer
working for UK hedge fund Hermitage Capital Management. A human
rights commission appointed by President Dmitry Medvedev concluded
the police had fabricated the charges against Magnitsky.
Wiretaps for suits
05.13.11
The recent insider trading conviction
of billionaire Raj Rajaratnam shows that federal prosecutors will
increasingly be using wiretaps to build fraud cases involving Wall
Street executives. It also signals the growing acceptance by
federal judges that, despite the extraordinary cost and
invasiveness of such procedures (agents are directed to stop
listening when talk turns from business to private--yes, stop the
laughter), wiretaps have reached a kind of critical mass of
acceptance in the surveillance nation we now inhabit.
In a related matter, Massachusetts law enforcement officials are pushing for a change to antiquated state wiretap laws. An interesting side note is that if the law is changed, it should signal the end to a large number of frivolous wiretapping charges brought against Mass. citizens who are documenting police activity. The Boston Police Dept. is being sued in a major case on that exact issue. The case is Glik v. Cunniffe et al., Civil Action No. 10-10150.
The story and video from the arrest is available here.
In a related matter, Massachusetts law enforcement officials are pushing for a change to antiquated state wiretap laws. An interesting side note is that if the law is changed, it should signal the end to a large number of frivolous wiretapping charges brought against Mass. citizens who are documenting police activity. The Boston Police Dept. is being sued in a major case on that exact issue. The case is Glik v. Cunniffe et al., Civil Action No. 10-10150.
The story and video from the arrest is available here.
Yahoo joins Google: We want to stalk Americans for 18 months
04.19.11
Yahoo has announced that it will join Google in
stalking Americans electronically in some form for 18 months (Yahoo
had in 2008 reduced the amount of time it retained users’
Internet search data to a mere 90 days). Yahoo plans to extend the
retention period this summer. Retained search data will include
user’s IP addresses and cookies, which means data can be
linked to individual devices or people. After 18 months, Yahoo will
retain most of the data, but anonymize it so it cannot be linked to
individuals.
Google has a slight variation in their policy which is being misreported in wake of this story: From Google: “We believe anonymizing IP addresses after 9 months and cookies in our search engine logs after 18 months strikes the right balance.” Stalkers do have some sense of decorum after all.
Google has a slight variation in their policy which is being misreported in wake of this story: From Google: “We believe anonymizing IP addresses after 9 months and cookies in our search engine logs after 18 months strikes the right balance.” Stalkers do have some sense of decorum after all.
Judge refuses to snip non-compete
03.24.11
A Massachusetts court in Zona Corp. v
McKinnon upheld a 1 year non-compete signed by a hair dresser who
had been fired from the salon. The fact that the hair dresser
employment came to end involuntarily did not affect the enforcement
of the clause. At stake was the usual scenario that investigators
are called upon to prove: the former employee was using
confidential information to make contact with former customers.
Some memorable situations at this firm have involved men who are
violating a non-competition agreements and can't help bragging at
the hotel bar to the lovely and attentive brunette--who is, of
course, a private investigator.
Federal conviction rates remain high
03.18.11
Mass Lawyers Weekly reports again on
the high conviction rates in federal court. In Massachusetts,
federal court conviction rates are 89% in 2010. For that year,
federal conviction rates were 87% nationwide. Some federal
prosecutors attribute this to working closely with investigators
from the beginning of a case. Others point out that federal
prosecutors have greater leeway on picking which cases--especially
white collar cases--to prosecute than do state prosecutors
By comparison, a 2006 article in the Pittsburg Tribune reported: “Between 2000 and 2005, 99 percent of the 435,000 federal criminal defendants prosecuted nationwide were convicted. The conviction rate was the same for the 2,130 criminal defendants prosecuted during that period in the Western District of Pennsylvania.
...
A defense lawyer had a different take: “A 90-plus percent conviction rate isn't something that should be applauded. I think it's something you should worry about," Boas said. "That's what you see in totalitarian regimes."
By comparison, a 2006 article in the Pittsburg Tribune reported: “Between 2000 and 2005, 99 percent of the 435,000 federal criminal defendants prosecuted nationwide were convicted. The conviction rate was the same for the 2,130 criminal defendants prosecuted during that period in the Western District of Pennsylvania.
...
A defense lawyer had a different take: “A 90-plus percent conviction rate isn't something that should be applauded. I think it's something you should worry about," Boas said. "That's what you see in totalitarian regimes."
Offshore firms promised 318% return--in 190 day period
03.05.11
Mass. Sec. of State Securities
Division filed a complaint against offshore firms Eagle Trades Ltd.
and controlling member Terrance Osberger, as well as Osiris FX and
FX Capital Services (and Osiris' Evan Andersen, Glenn Manterfield
and Alberto Sciola). All are accused of violating state securities
laws and, in some instance, defrauding investors. Eagle Trades
claimed return rates between 299% and 318% --in just 190 days. The
firm’s promotional literature included remarks like “ .
. . we have reengineered the mold regarding HYIPS...think of it as
a full-throttle upgrade to the typical HYIP routine you may or may
not be familiar with....”
Due diligence by investors would have easily raised red flags: Andersen had been barred for life from the securities industry in Massachusetts after he and Manterfield were charged both by Massachusetts and the Securities and Exchange Commission with defrauding investors in 2007.
Due diligence by investors would have easily raised red flags: Andersen had been barred for life from the securities industry in Massachusetts after he and Manterfield were charged both by Massachusetts and the Securities and Exchange Commission with defrauding investors in 2007.
Case on scope of DPPA appealed to Supreme Ct.
02.21.11
A Texas case, Taylor v. Acxiom et al.
is under appeal to the Supreme Court to clarify opposing rulings in
federal courts about the scope of the Driver’s Privacy
Protection Act (18 U.S.C., Chapter 123, §§ 2721-2725. While the
DPPA has specific provisions for law enforcement and private
investigators to access the data, the state of Texas has allowed
mail order businesses to purchase driving records. The plaintiffs
in Taylor argue that neither type of defendant has access to the
records.
Lumping the two types together seems a weak position given the specific exceptions of the statute. The crux of the dispute lies in the Taylor court’s determination that an authorized recipient of DMV records is not required to show that it is also an authorized user of the data. “Instead, an authorized recipient is authorized to resell to individuals for one or more of the specific purposes under section 2721 (b),” Judge William L. Garwood wrote on behalf of the 5th Circuit. The interpretation allows for an “authorized recipient to mean something different than one who has a permissible actual use.”
A case going the other direction was in Missouri. In 2008, Judge Nanette K. Laughrey found in Roberts, et al. v. The Source for Public Data, et al., that defendants did not qualify as “authorized recipients” of DMV records under the DPPA.
Lumping the two types together seems a weak position given the specific exceptions of the statute. The crux of the dispute lies in the Taylor court’s determination that an authorized recipient of DMV records is not required to show that it is also an authorized user of the data. “Instead, an authorized recipient is authorized to resell to individuals for one or more of the specific purposes under section 2721 (b),” Judge William L. Garwood wrote on behalf of the 5th Circuit. The interpretation allows for an “authorized recipient to mean something different than one who has a permissible actual use.”
A case going the other direction was in Missouri. In 2008, Judge Nanette K. Laughrey found in Roberts, et al. v. The Source for Public Data, et al., that defendants did not qualify as “authorized recipients” of DMV records under the DPPA.
Whistleblower protections
02.04.11
Talking with some investigators who
attended a qui tam conference, and one highlighted a good breakdown
of protections and substantial cash rewards available to
whistleblowers who provide the Securities and Exchange Commission
with information relating to corporate and securities fraud.
So remember, if you have evidence that a Wall Street boy is a dirty
rogue, call the SEC and help yourself to a chunk of his year end
bonus.
Surveillance drones hovering over a backyard near you
01.25.11
Washington Post reports that in Texas, the
Department of Public Safety used a small bird-size device called a
Wasp to float over a backyard and beam video to agents before a
search warrant was executed. As is typical in these scenarios, the
technology has migrated from military use to law enforcement.
Obvious problems with privacy laws, and the FAA is limiting use to
emergency situations. But at a cost of just $50,000, the civil
sector will be next.