Legality of GPS tracking
04.21.09
A Hingham incident shows how those who use (or misuse)
GPS tracking systems can face civil and criminal prosecution.
General rule is that the owner (or joint owners) of the vehicle can
install a GPS tracking system. Anyone else may face an invasion of
privacy suit -- or worse. Case law continues to evolve here.
Kroll, USIS, OPM investigators charged with falsifying background checks
04.14.09
Washington Post reported that employees for Office
of Personnel Management as well as subcontractors Kroll and USIS,
which handle the background inquiries for more than 100 federal
agencies, lied about interviews they never conducted and submitted
false statements.
In the race to the low price swamp, it has long been suspected that
some firms offer background checks at prices they cannot afford
without cutting corners ( "national criminal check"' for $4.95
anyone?). A shabby product is the logical result.Reading faces
04.10.09
Paul Ekman's decades of research are the
backbone of the Microexpression Training Tool [METTS]. Interesting
program with online video examples. If you read Ekman's books, he
explains that reading facial expressions does not automatically
reveal a liar. Microexpressions may be a sign of subterranean
emotions, but there is no expression that automatically signals
deception.
Senator Stevens' conviction overturned
04.08.09
Boston Globe reports a federal judge tossed out the
conviction of former US senator Ted Stevens after the Justice
Department admitted its prosecutors mishandled evidence in the
corruption case. Two prosecutors did not turn over notes from an
interview in April 2008 with the case's key witness--notes that
contained exculpatory evidence. Veteran defense investigators know
this is a not uncommon phenomenon: several agents
from different agencies sit in on one interview, and their notes
differ vastly from the "official report" that is eventually turned
over to the defense. Always good practice to identify everyone at
the meeting, and review notes from everyone present.
Prosecutors who handled the trial have been removed from the case and their conduct is under investigation.
Prosecutors who handled the trial have been removed from the case and their conduct is under investigation.
Death of weapons frisk greatly exaggerated after MA high court ruling
04.06.09
News reports are exaggerating the
impact of a new Supreme Judicial Court ruling in Massachusetts on a
police officer's right to stop and frisk suspects for weapons. This
right was established in 1968 in the Supreme Court case Terry v.
Ohio. In Commonwealth v. Paul Gomes, the SJC held that conducting a
pat frisk of a suspect solely on a general concern that he was in a
high crime area violates the Fourth Amendment prohibition on
unreasonable searches and seizures. Key line in the SJC case : "
Officer Walsh gave no testimony that the police observed anything
suggesting that the defendant had a weapon." Coupled with no
weapons priors for Gomes, the search was found to be
unreasonable.
No new law here. Just a reminder that, if no requirement existed for specific suspicions about a suspect, residents in high-crime areas could be pat frisked while simply walking in their neighborhood.
No new law here. Just a reminder that, if no requirement existed for specific suspicions about a suspect, residents in high-crime areas could be pat frisked while simply walking in their neighborhood.
Detecting a liar - the punishment question
04.03.09
Last week, traveled to Argentina with
the Boston Braves Football Club, and played against retired veteran
from legendary clubs Boca Juniors and River Plate, as well as
others. We did OK (no scores please), but the rat-a-tat-passing and
superior ball skills of the Argentines was impressive . With help
from my amigos, I witnessed an interesting incident at a Buenos
Aires shop whereby an owner grilled an employee over suspected
theft (in the open-- a slight departure from USA custom). Owner
asked, "What do you think I should do to the person who stole the .
. .?" This was interesting: many US interview courses teach this as
a key component during the interview process. Called the punishment
question by some (Reid), truthful suspects are open to some degree of
appropriate punishment.
