Can Johnny Read Nonverbal Cues?
08.28.09
Wall Street Journal has an opinion piece arguing
social networking puts younger people at a face-to-face
disadvantage. Although younger generations are communicating at a
hurried and increased pace with a variety of technological gadgets,
many of their communication tools involve the exchange of written
words alone. The author argues they "are ever less likely to
develop the "silent fluency" that comes from face-to-face
interaction. It is a skill that we all must learn, in actual social
settings, from people (often older) who are adept in the idiom. As
text-centered messaging increases, such occasions diminish. The
digital natives improve their adroitness at the keyboard, but when
it comes to their capacity to "read" the behavior of others, they
are all thumbs."
Interesting observation. In the dozens of successful con artists we have investigated over the years, almost all were described by friends and victims (who were often former friends or lovers) as having highly evolved social skills--charming in all the bad ways. If someone gave off signs saying they were a victim, these guys read that message and pounced.
Interesting observation. In the dozens of successful con artists we have investigated over the years, almost all were described by friends and victims (who were often former friends or lovers) as having highly evolved social skills--charming in all the bad ways. If someone gave off signs saying they were a victim, these guys read that message and pounced.
Reading faces
04.10.09
Paul Ekman's decades of research are the
backbone of the Microexpression Training Tool [METTS]. Interesting
program with online video examples. If you read Ekman's books, he
explains that reading facial expressions does not automatically
reveal a liar. Microexpressions may be a sign of subterranean
emotions, but there is no expression that automatically signals
deception.
